UPE Articles

Ministry of Education Attacks Educators With Tattoo’s

Ministry Official Threatening Disciplinary Action Against Educator With Tattoo

An unsettling pattern of discrimination has emerged within St Ignatius College, where some educators report being targeted over visible tattoos despite the absence of formal policies governing body art. This situation exposes arbitrary enforcement of outdated standards and contradictions across the public service.  

The Policy Void & Selective Enforcement

While the Public Service Management Code (PSMC) vaguely mandates tattoos be “adequately covered,” the Ministry of Education has never established sector-specific guidelines—a failure violating the PSMC’s own requirement for ministries to develop approved policies.  

This regulatory vacuum has enabled inconsistent practices:  

  • Some educators face ongoing pressure to conceal tattoos despite flawless professional performance.  
  • Multiple other colleagues at the same college (St Ignatius College) display visible tattoos without repercussions, confirming enforcement is neither uniform nor impartial.  

Public Sector Double Standards

Other state entities have adopted modern, nuanced approaches:  

  • Malta Police (2022): Bans tattoos only on necks/faces/palms; permits elsewhere if non-offensive.  
  • Civil Protection Department: Allows case-by-case evaluations if tattoos are coverable by uniforms and inoffensive.  

The hypocrisy is undeniable: While police outright prohibit certain tattoo placements, educators are harassed under a nonexistent ministry policy for failing to conceal similar body art. Why are educators held to harsher, vaguer standards than uniformed services?  

The Union of  Professional Educators asserts:  

Policies must prioritize professional merit, not personal appearance. Body art reflects cultural identity protected under the PSMC’s “diversity and inclusion” principles.  

Forcing educators to wear concealing attire in non-climate-controlled schools during summer poses documented health risks and impedes physically demanding roles.  

We ask the Minister of Education Hon Clifton Grima  the following;

1. Should educators with tattoos be penalized for their appearance rather than for their performance?

2. When is the Ministry of Education going to align itself with other public services, permitting non-offensive tattoos unless proven to hinder professional duties?

Malta’s students lose when dedicated professionals face harassment over ink while excelling at their jobs.

Related News

Why Does UPE Stand Out?

A traditional, antiquated trade union typically represents workers in a general context and engages in broad discussions with the employees’

Related News

Why Does UPE Stand Out?

A traditional, antiquated trade union typically represents workers in a general context and engages in broad discussions with the employees’

Login

UPE
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.